Re: [PATCH] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Check if user asked for EINJV2 injection

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Aug 18 2025 - 12:09:26 EST


On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 5:58 PM Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2025/8/15 0:17, Tony Luck wrote:
> > On an EINJV2 capable system, users may still use the old injection
> > interface but einj_get_parameter_address() takes the EINJV2 path to map
> > the parameter structure. This results in the address the user supplied
> > being stored to the wrong location and the BIOS injecting based on an
> > uninitialized field (0x0 in the reported case).
> >
> > Check the version of the request when mapping the EINJ parameter
> > structure in BIOS reserved memory.
> >
> > Fixes: 691a0f0a557b ("ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Discover EINJv2 parameters")
> > Reported-by: Lai, Yi1 <yi1.lai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/apei/einj-core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj-core.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj-core.c
> > index bf8dc92a373a..99f1b841fba9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj-core.c
> > @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void __iomem *einj_get_parameter_address(void)
> > memcpy_fromio(&v5param, p, v5param_size);
> > acpi5 = 1;
> > check_vendor_extension(pa_v5, &v5param);
> > - if (available_error_type & ACPI65_EINJV2_SUPP) {
> > + if (is_v2 && available_error_type & ACPI65_EINJV2_SUPP) {
> > len = v5param.einjv2_struct.length;
> > offset = offsetof(struct einjv2_extension_struct, component_arr);
> > max_nr_components = (len - offset) /
>
> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <gouhanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied as 6.17-rc material, thanks!