Re: [PATCH v9] rust: transmute: Add methods for FromBytes trait

[Christian]

Hi, Alexandre.

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 8:28 AM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed Aug 13, 2025 at 3:00 AM JST, Christian wrote:
> > Hi, Alexandre.
> >
> >> I mentioned it on v8 [1] and v7 [2], but the tests that break due to
> >> this change need to be updated by this patch as well. This includes:
> >>
> >> * The doctests in `rust/kernel/dma.rs`,
> >> * The `samples/rust/rust_dma.rs` sample,
> >> * The example for `FromBytes` introduced by this patch which uses `?` without
> >> defining a function.
> >
> > Sorry for my inattention, I'll fix this in the next version.
>
> Ah, as it turns out you might not need to.
>
> We discussed this patch a bit during the DRM sync, and the consensus was
> that it would probably be better to keep things a bit simpler for the
> first version. The `FromBytesSized` trait in particular was not very
> popular; a better long-term way to provide implementations for
> `FromBytes` would be to use a derive macro, but that's out of scope for
> now.
>
> Instead, we agreed that the following would make a good first version:
>
> - Make the `FromBytes` trait depend on `Sized`,
> - Provide default implementations for `from_bytes` and `from_bytes_mut`
>   directly in the `FromBytes` trait,
> - No implementation for slices for now,
> - Consequently, no user code will break due to the addition of the
>   methods, which is a big plus.
>
> The simpler version that would result from this covers all the immediate
> use-cases and would be easier to merge, which will give us some time to
> think about how to handle the non-sized use cases (probably via a derive
> macro).
>
> Do you think you could write the next version along these lines?

Yes, no problem.

> I feel like I misdirected you with the `FromBytesSized` trait, so please
> accept my apologies for that.

Don't worry, your guidance was really helpful during this time, no
need for excuses.

Thanks,
Christian