Re: [net-next v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: dsa: yt921x: Add Motorcomm YT921x switch support
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Tue Aug 19 2025 - 02:27:58 EST
On 18/08/2025 18:55, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> + motorcomm,switch-id:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>> + description: |
>> + Value selected by Pin SWITCH_ID_1 / SWITCH_ID_0.
>> +
>> + Up to 4 chips can share the same MII port ('reg' in DT) by giving
>> + different SWITCH_ID values. The default value should work if only one chip
>> + is present.
>> + enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]
>> + default: 0
>
> It is like getting blood from a stone.
>
> So what you are saying is that you have:
>
> mdio {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> switch@1d {
> compatible = "motorcomm,yt9215";
> /* default 0x1d, alternate 0x0 */
> reg = <0x1d>;
> motorcomm,switch-id = <0>;
> reset-gpios = <&tlmm 39 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> ...
> }
>
> switch@1d {
> compatible = "motorcomm,yt9215";
> reg = <0x1d>;
> motorcomm,switch-id = <1>;
> reset-gpios = <&tlmm 39 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> ...
> }
>
> switch@1d {
> compatible = "motorcomm,yt9215";
> reg = <0x1d>;
> motorcomm,switch-id = <2>;
> reset-gpios = <&tlmm 39 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> ...
> }
> }
>
> Have you tested this? My _guess_ is, it does not work.
Regardless if kernel actually works with this, but duplicating unit
address is not supported, so this obviously would be wrong. I guess
that's the answer for switch-id.
Best regards,
Krzysztof