Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: gro: only merge packets with incrementing or fixed outer ids

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:46:01 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> It's a bit unclear what the meaning of inner and outer are in the
> unencapsulated (i.e., normal) case. In my intuition outer only exists
> if encapsulated, but it seems you reason the other way around: inner
> is absent unless encapsulated. 

+1, whether the header in unencapsulted packet is inner or outer
is always a source of unnecessary confusion. I would have also
preferred your suggestion on v1 to use _ENCAP in the name.