Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: update pinctrl names for Radxa E52C
From: FUKAUMI Naoki
Date: Tue Aug 19 2025 - 22:18:05 EST
Hi Chukun,
On 8/20/25 00:00, Chukun Pan wrote:
Hi,
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic".
https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/v0.4/source/chapter2-devicetree-basics.rst?plain=1#L193
Usually we use the name on the schematic. For example, the patch for e24c:
I don't mind using names that match the schematic, as long as the device
tree maintainer doesn't object.
Best regards,
--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250727144409.327740-4-jonas@xxxxxxxxx/
```
+ gpio-keys {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&gpio0_a0_user>;
```
If this is incorrect, I will abandon the pinctrl changes for
the user key and power LED.
- vcc_5v0_pwren_h: regulator-5v0-1 {
- usb_otg_pwren_h: regulator-5v0-0 {
But I don't think the above is correct.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241216113052.15696-1-naoki@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
(I don't understand why this only applies to me...)
I don't know this. I thought the nodenames of pinctrl and regulator
were a bit weird, so I changed the pinctrl's.
Thanks,
Chukun
--
2.25.1