Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] parisc/sys_parisc.c: add `const` to mmap_upper_limit() parameter
From: Max Kellermann
Date: Mon Sep 01 2025 - 02:07:11 EST
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 2:38 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since you're going to respin this series anyway, your tags are a
> disaster. Tags are not filenames. They're just to indicate to people
> that they should pay attention because it touches their area of
> interest. So this one should just be labelled "parisc:", not
> "parisc/sys_parisc.c:"
OK, "parisc:" is understood - but what tag shall I use for all the
other patches? They're all subsystem "mm". Are they supposed to all
have the same subject? My initial post had that - it was one single
patch that touched the "mm" subsystem".
(Also I'd appreciate a wording less strong than calling an aspect of
my work "a disaster". This is mostly just taste;
submitting-patches.rst is unspecific enough. And quite a few commits
contradict with your interpretation like 620943d7ee69
("include/linux/mmzone.h: clean up watermark accessors").)