Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] mm/shmem: add `const` to lots of pointer parameters

[Max Kellermann]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:32 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sure, but first I need to know what is really needed. Reviews on LKML
> > are often contradictory, and it's easy to get pushed around from one
> > corner to the next.
> >
> > I just posted v4 with longer commit messages. I think that's a lot of
> > unnecessary noise that takes a lot of time to read, but oh well, if
> > that's what you guys really want...
>
> No I don't think we want a passive-aggressive malicious compliance.

What the .....
Your response is similar to what I mean with "getting pushed around".

You guys insist on verbose commit messages, or else it won't get
merged, you say. I don't agree, but when I yield to your requirements,
take the time to implement them, I get accused of being
"passive-aggressive" and "malicious".

Please be more respectful when handling code submissions.