Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fix some spelling mistakes in the scheduler module
From: Christian Loehle
Date: Tue Sep 30 2025 - 04:27:04 EST
On 9/29/25 07:12, Jianyun Gao wrote:
> From: "jianyun.gao" <jianyungao89@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The following are some spelling mistakes existing in the scheduler
> module. Just fix it!
>
> slection -> selection
> achitectures -> architectures
> excempt -> except
> incorectly -> incorrectly
> litle -> little
> faireness -> fairness
> condtion -> condition
>
> Signed-off-by: jianyun.gao <jianyungao89@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V2:
> Delete the incorrect modifications for "borken" in V1.
> The previous version is here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250926092832.1457477-1-jianyungao89@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++----
> kernel/sched/wait_bit.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7f1e5cb94c53..af5076e40567 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6858,7 +6858,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
> /*
> * We pass task_is_blocked() as the should_block arg
> * in order to keep mutex-blocked tasks on the runqueue
> - * for slection with proxy-exec (without proxy-exec
> + * for selection with proxy-exec (without proxy-exec
> * task_is_blocked() will always be false).
> */
> try_to_block_task(rq, prev, &prev_state,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index 7097de2c8cda..2429be5a5e40 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr, struct prev_cputime *prev,
> stime = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(stime, rtime, stime + utime);
> /*
> * Because mul_u64_u64_div_u64() can approximate on some
> - * achitectures; enforce the constraint that: a*b/(b+c) <= a.
> + * architectures; enforce the constraint that: a*b/(b+c) <= a.
> */
> if (unlikely(stime > rtime))
> stime = rtime;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 18a30ae35441..20fe5899b247 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5381,7 +5381,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> bool delay = sleep;
> /*
> * DELAY_DEQUEUE relies on spurious wakeups, special task
> - * states must not suffer spurious wakeups, excempt them.
> + * states must not suffer spurious wakeups, except them.
This should be exempt, no?