Re: [RFC PATCH 13/15] iommufd: Persist iommu domains for live update

[Pasha Tatashin]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 1:32 PM Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 9:00 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 07:06:21PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> > > +static int iommufd_save_ioas(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
> > > +                          struct iommufd_lu *iommufd_lu)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt_paging;
> > > +     struct iommufd_ioas *ioas = NULL;
> > > +     struct iommufd_object *obj;
> > > +     unsigned long index;
> > > +     int rc;
> > > +
> > > +     /* Iterate each ioas. */
> > > +     xa_for_each(&ictx->objects, index, obj) {
> > > +             if (obj->type != IOMMUFD_OBJ_IOAS)
> > > +                     continue;
> >
> > Wrong locking
> >
> > > +
> > > +             ioas = (struct iommufd_ioas *)obj;
> > > +             mutex_lock(&ioas->mutex);
> > > +
> > > +             /*
> > > +              * TODO: Iterate over each device of this iommufd and only save
> > > +              * hwpt/domain if the device is persisted.
> > > +              */
> > > +             list_for_each_entry(hwpt_paging, &ioas->hwpt_list, hwpt_item) {
> > > +                     if (!hwpt_paging->common.domain)
> > > +                             continue;
> >
> > I don't think this should be automatic. The user should directly
> > serialize/unserialize HWPTs by ID.
> Interesting. So the user should be able to serialize/unserialize HWPTs
> before the Live Update PREPARE event? But what if a device was marked
> for preservation but the user never serialized the attached HWPT,
> would that be considered an error during LUO PREPARE or should iommufd
> serialize the remaining HWPTs here?

Users ~can~ serialize their sessions before system-wide prepare event.
During prepare event all unserialized sessions and their FDs are going
to be serialized anyways.

Pasha

> >
> > Jason