Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sdx75: Drop QPIC interconnect and BCM nodes

From: Konrad Dybcio

Date: Fri Sep 26 2025 - 09:46:40 EST


On 9/26/25 8:42 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As like other SDX SoCs, SDX75 SoC's QPIC BCM resource was modeled as a
> RPMh clock in clk-rpmh driver. However, for SDX75, this resource was also
> described as an interconnect and BCM node mistakenly. It is incorrect to
> describe the same resource in two different providers, as it will lead to
> votes from clients overriding each other.
>
> Hence, drop the QPIC interconnect and BCM nodes and let the clients use
> clk-rpmh driver to vote for this resource.
>
> Without this change, the NAND driver fails to probe on SDX75, as the
> interconnect sync state disables the QPIC nodes as there were no clients
> voting for this ICC resource. However, the NAND driver had already voted
> for this BCM resource through the clk-rpmh driver. Since both votes come
> from Linux, RPMh was unable to distinguish between these two and ends up
> disabling the QPIC resource during sync state.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 3642b4e5cbfe ("interconnect: qcom: Add SDX75 interconnect provider driver")
> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mani: dropped the reference to bcm_qp0, reworded description]
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Too bad no one noticed for the 2 years the platform has been upstream..

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Konrad