RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] media: chips-media: wave5: Improve performance of decoder

[jackson . lee]

Hi Nicolas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 3:00 AM
> To: Brandon Brnich <b-brnich@xxxxxx>; jackson.lee
> <jackson.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil-
> cisco@xxxxxxxxx; bob.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lafley.kim
> <lafley.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx; Nas Chung
> <nas.chung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] media: chips-media: wave5: Improve performance
> of decoder
> 
> Hi Brandon,
> 
> Le lundi 22 septembre 2025 à 12:32 -0500, Brandon Brnich a écrit :
> > > -	/*
> > > -	 * During a resolution change and while draining, the firmware may
> > > flush
> > > -	 * the reorder queue regardless of having a matching decoding
> > > operation
> > > -	 * pending. Only terminate the job if there are no more IRQ coming.
> > > -	 */
> > > -	wave5_vpu_dec_give_command(inst, DEC_GET_QUEUE_STATUS, &q_status);
> > > -	if (q_status.report_queue_count == 0 &&
> > > -	    (q_status.instance_queue_count == 0 ||
> > > dec_info.sequence_changed)) {
> > > -		dev_dbg(inst->dev->dev, "%s: finishing job.\n", __func__);
> > > -		pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(inst->dev->dev);
> >
> > Patch is failing to apply here to linux-next because these redundant
> > calls have already been removed[0].
> 
> Which have not been merged back from the RC into media-committers/next,
> forcing to skip a cycle. Jackson, feel free to rebase on linux-next like
> Brandon suggest.

Then should I make v6 patch series based on Linux-next ?

Thanks
Jackson

> 
> regards,

> Nicolas