On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:11:39AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
HiThat sounds like a good idea, but I wonder how we would deal with reset
Am 15.09.25 um 10:42 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
Hi Tohmas,Probably not. The reset helper is supposed to initialize the object's
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
I agree that it's clunky. I'm not sure who would use it at this point+/**Chancing the crtc->state pointer behind the back of the reset callback seems
+ * drm_atomic_build_readout_state - Creates an initial state from the hardware
+ * @dev: DRM device to build the state for
+ *
+ * This function allocates a &struct drm_atomic_state, calls the
+ * atomic_readout_state callbacks, and fills the global state old states
+ * by what the callbacks returned.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *
+ * A partially initialized &struct drm_atomic_state on success, an error
+ * pointer otherwise.
+ */
+static struct drm_atomic_state *
+drm_atomic_build_readout_state(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
+ struct drm_atomic_state *state;
+ struct drm_mode_config *config =
+ &dev->mode_config;
+ struct drm_connector *connector;
+ struct drm_printer p =
+ drm_info_printer(dev->dev);
+ struct drm_encoder *encoder;
+ struct drm_plane *plane;
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+ int ret;
+
+ drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Starting to build atomic state from hardware state.\n");
+
+ state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev);
+ if (WARN_ON(!state))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ state->connectors = kcalloc(config->num_connector, sizeof(*state->connectors), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (WARN_ON(!state->connectors)) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_state_put;
+ }
+
+ state->private_objs = kcalloc(count_private_obj(dev), sizeof(*state->private_objs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (WARN_ON(!state->private_objs)) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_state_put;
+ }
+
+ drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, dev) {
+ const struct drm_crtc_funcs *crtc_funcs =
+ crtc->funcs;
+ struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
+
+ drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Initializing CRTC %s state.\n", crtc->name);
+
+ if (crtc_funcs->atomic_readout_state) {
+ crtc_state = crtc_funcs->atomic_readout_state(crtc);
+ } else if (crtc_funcs->reset) {
+ crtc_funcs->reset(crtc);
+
+ /*
+ * We don't want to set crtc->state field yet. Let's save and clear it up.
+ */
+ crtc_state = crtc->state;
+ crtc->state = NULL;
fragile. We never how if some other piece of the driver refers to it
(although illegally).
though: we're in the middle of the drm_mode_config_reset(), so the
drivers' involvement is pretty minimal.
I did wonder if changing reset to return the object instead of setting
$OBJECT->state would be a better interface?
software and hardware state. But in most drivers, we're currently mostly
setting the minimal software state here and simply assume that hardware is
off. Returning the state would water down semantics even further.
Having said that, I could imaging building an atomic_clean_state callback
that replaces the reset callback. It would work alongside the new
atomic_readout_state callback. Current reset could be build upon that
callback. The atomic_clean_state would intentionally only take care of the
software state and leave hardware state undefined. This reflects the current
realities of most DRM drivers. From that clean state, DRM could do an
atomic commit that also initializes the hardware.
then? Should we remove it entirely? Still call it? What do you think?
Yeah, that sounds fair.That's what I meant, I think.For now, wouldn't it be better to require a read-out helper for all elementsI also considered that, but I'm not sure we can expect bridges to have
of the driver's mode-setting pipeline? The trivial implementation would
copy the existing reset function and keep crtc->state to NULL.
readout hooks filled for every configuration in the wild.
But maybe we can look during drm_mode_config_reset() at whether all the
objects have their hook filled, and if not fall back on reset for
everything.
It would make the implementation easier, but missing bridgesIf there's an element in the pipeline that's missing the readout helper, it
implementations would trigger a mode change when it might actually work
just fine since bridge state is pretty minimal.
might be safer to fallback to that modeset instead of ending up with
inconsistent state.
Maxime