Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] cxl/port: Avoid missing port component registers setup

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Wed Oct 01 2025 - 10:34:53 EST


On Wed, 1 Oct 2025 14:03:37 +0800
Li Ming <ming.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> port->nr_dports is used to represent how many dports added to the cxl
> port, it will increase in add_dport() when a new dport is being added to
> the cxl port, but it will not be reduced when a dport is removed from
> the cxl port.
>
> Currently, when the first dport is added to a cxl port, it will trigger
> component registers setup on the cxl port, the implementation is using
> port->nr_dports to confirm if the dport is the first dport.
>
> A corner case here is that adding dport could fail after port->nr_dports
> updating and before checking port->nr_dports for component registers
> setup. If the failure happens during the first dport attaching, it will
> cause that CXL subsystem has not chance to execute component registers
> setup for the cxl port. the failure flow like below:
>
> port->nr_dports = 0
> dport 1 adding to the port:
> add_dport() # port->nr_dports: 1
> failed on devm_add_action_or_reset() or sysfs_create_link()
> return error # port->nr_dports: 1
> dport 2 adding to the port:
> add_dport() # port->nr_dports: 2
> no failure
> skip component registers setup because of port->nr_dports is 2
>
> The solution here is that moving component registers setup closer to
> add_dport(), so if add_dport() is executed correctly for the first
> dport, component registers setup on the port will be executed
> immediately after that.
>
> Fixes: f6ee24913de2 ("cxl: Move port register setup to when first dport appear")
> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Seems reasonable. Alternative would have been to carry a 'it went horribly wrong'
flag and fail the later additions as well (on basis a failure in the relevant calls
is very unlikely). This seems simpler.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

J