Re: [PATCH v17 30/47] fs/jbd2: use a weaker annotation in journal handling
From: Jan Kara
Date: Thu Oct 02 2025 - 04:47:13 EST
On Thu 02-10-25 17:12:30, Byungchul Park wrote:
> jbd2 journal handling code doesn't want jbd2_might_wait_for_commit()
> to be placed between start_this_handle() and stop_this_handle(). So it
> marks the region with rwsem_acquire_read() and rwsem_release().
>
> However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have
> to use more than try lock annotation for that.
>
> rwsem_acquire_read() implies:
>
> 1. might be a waiter on contention of the lock.
> 2. enter to the critical section of the lock.
>
> All we need in here is to act 2, not 1. So trylock version of
> annotation is sufficient for that purpose. Now that dept partially
> relies on lockdep annotaions, dept interpets rwsem_acquire_read() as a
> potential wait and might report a deadlock by the wait.
>
> Replace it with trylock version of annotation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@xxxxxx>
Indeed. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Honza
> ---
> fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> index c7867139af69..b4e65f51bf5e 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int start_this_handle(journal_t *journal, handle_t *handle,
> read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
> current->journal_info = handle;
>
> - rwsem_acquire_read(&journal->j_trans_commit_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
> + rwsem_acquire_read(&journal->j_trans_commit_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_);
> jbd2_journal_free_transaction(new_transaction);
> /*
> * Ensure that no allocations done while the transaction is open are
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR