Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce bitfield and move register macro to rust/kernel/

[Alexandre Courbot]

On Tue Oct 7, 2025 at 7:42 PM JST, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:36 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> We can assume maintainership of this of course, but is there a problem
>> if this falls under the core Rust umbrella? As this is a pretty core
>> functionality. Miguel and other core folks, WDYT?
>
> I think what Yury may mean is that this should get an explicit
> `MAINTAINERS` subentry even if it falls under `rust/kernel/` -- I
> agree that is a good idea.

Ack - how do you expect things to work in terms of code flow? Do we need
to have a dedicated tree and send you pull requests? If so, should we
host it under the Rust-for-Linux Github org?