Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] samples/bpf: Fix spelling typo in samples/bpf

[Alex Williamson]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 14:08:49 +0800
Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> do_hbm_test.sh:
> The comment incorrectly used "upcomming" instead of "upcoming".
> 
> hbm.c
> The comment incorrectly used "Managment" instead of "Management".
> The comment incorrectly used "Currrently" instead of "Currently".
> 
> tcp_cong_kern.c
> The comment incorrectly used "deteremined" instead of "determined".
> 
> tracex1.bpf.c
> The comment incorrectly used "loobpack" instead of "loopback".
> 
> mtty.c
> The comment incorrectly used "atleast" instead of "at least".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  samples/bpf/do_hbm_test.sh  | 2 +-
>  samples/bpf/hbm.c           | 4 ++--
>  samples/bpf/tcp_cong_kern.c | 2 +-
>  samples/bpf/tracex1.bpf.c   | 2 +-
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c    | 2 +-
>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
...
> diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> index 59eefe2fed10..6cb3e5974990 100644
> --- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> +++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static void handle_bar_read(unsigned int index, struct mdev_state *mdev_state,
>  		u8 lsr = 0;
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&mdev_state->rxtx_lock);
> -		/* atleast one char in FIFO */
> +		/* at least one char in FIFO */
>  		if (mdev_state->s[index].rxtx.head !=
>  				 mdev_state->s[index].rxtx.tail)
>  			lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;

I'd suggest this go through bpf since it touches more there.  For mtty,

Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>