Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Remove i2c_dw_remove_lock_support()
From: Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
Date: Tue Oct 14 2025 - 17:58:59 EST
On 10/14/2025 3:33 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[+cc Mario, author of 440da737cf8d ("i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP
driver for communication")]
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 06:05:03PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
When building certain configurations with CONFIG_FINEIBT=y after
commit 894af4a1cde6 ("objtool: Validate kCFI calls"), there is a
warning due to an indirect call in dw_i2c_plat_remove():
$ cat allno.config
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_CFI=y
CONFIG_COMMON_CLK=y
CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=y
CONFIG_I2C=y
CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL=y
CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_CORE=y
CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y
CONFIG_IOSF_MBI=y
CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=y
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_PCI=y
CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y
$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 LLVM=1 clean allnoconfig vmlinux
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: dw_i2c_plat_remove+0x3c: no-cfi indirect call!
With this configuration, i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table has the BAYTRAIL
member and the sentinel (i.e., 2 members), both of which have an
implicit
.remove = NULL,
so Clang effectively turns i2c_dw_remove_lock_support(), which is later
inlined into dw_i2c_plat_remove(), into:
static void i2c_dw_remove_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
{
if (dev->semaphore_idx > 2)
(*NULL)(dev):
}
which is not necessarily problematic from a logic perspective (as the
code was not bounds checking semaphore_idx so an out of bounds index
could already crash) but objtool's new __nocfi indirect call checking
trips over Clang dropping the kCFI setup from a known NULL indirect
call.
While it would be possible to fix this by transforming the initial check
into
if (dev->semaphore_idx < 0 || dev->semaphore_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table))
the remove member is unused after commit 440da737cf8d ("i2c: designware:
Use PCI PSP driver for communication"), so i2c_dw_remove_lock_support()
can be removed altogether, as it will never actually do anything.
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2133
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm totally fine with the patch itself, but I think the commit log
could be trimmed to something like the following with no loss:
Remove struct i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks.remove() and
i2c_dw_remove_lock_support().
440da737cf8d ("i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP driver for
communication") removed the last place that set
i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks.remove(), which made
i2c_dw_remove_lock_support() a no-op.
This has the side effect of avoiding this kCFI warning (see Link):
dw_i2c_plat_remove+0x3c: no-cfi indirect call!
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251013-dw_i2c_plat_remove-avoid-objtool-no-cfi-warning-v1-1-8cc4842967bf@xxxxxxxxxx
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
I echo Bjorn's comments on the lengthy commit message.
Code change looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 1 -
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 11 -----------
2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
index 347843b4f5dd..d50664377c6b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
@@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
struct i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks {
int (*probe)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
- void (*remove)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
};
int i2c_dw_init_regmap(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
index 34d881572351..cff7e03dea7b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -197,15 +197,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
return 0;
}
-static void i2c_dw_remove_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
-{
- if (dev->semaphore_idx < 0)
- return;
-
- if (i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table[dev->semaphore_idx].remove)
- i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table[dev->semaphore_idx].remove(dev);
-}
-
static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
u32 flags = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
@@ -339,8 +330,6 @@ static void dw_i2c_plat_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
i2c_dw_prepare_clk(dev, false);
- i2c_dw_remove_lock_support(dev);
-
reset_control_assert(dev->rst);
}
---
base-commit: 3a8660878839faadb4f1a6dd72c3179c1df56787
change-id: 20251013-dw_i2c_plat_remove-avoid-objtool-no-cfi-warning-5f2040eaadc2
Best regards,
--
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>