Re: [PATCH v2] printk_legacy_map: use LD_WAIT_CONFIG instead of LD_WAIT_SLEEP

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 10/23, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> On 2025-10-23 12:32:34 [+0200], Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > printk_legacy_map is used on !PREEMPT_RT to avoid false positives from
> > CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING about raw_spinlock/spinlock nesting.
>
> Could we please get rid of CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING here? This is
> lockdep internal implementation and has nothing to do with printk or
> anything.

OK, but let me ensure I didn't miss something (again ;).

I mentioned CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING in the changelog because if
CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=n, then LD_WAIT_CONFIG == LD_WAIT_SPIN
and lockdep will not complain if spinlock_t nests inside raw_spinlock_t.

IOW, without CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING printk_legacy_map is not
really needed.

Right?

Oleg.