Re: [PATCH v2 net] sfc: fix potential memory leak in efx_mae_process_mport()

[Abdun Nihaal]

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 05:48:12PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Why not make the caller responsible for freeing desc on failure?

I put the free inside because another function efx_mae_add_mport 
called by efx_mae_process_mport was freeing desc on failure, so I
followed the same style of code, but yes making the caller responsible
would be more cleaner. I'll send a revised patch.