Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: lan9662-otpc: Add LAN969x series

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sun Oct 26 2025 - 06:10:24 EST


On 24/10/2025 21:24, Robert Marko wrote:
> LAN969x series also has the same HW block, its just 16KB instead of 8KB
> like on LAN966x series.
>
> So, document compatibles for the LAN969x series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml
> index f97c6beb4766..f8c68cf22c1c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml
> @@ -23,8 +23,15 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - const: microchip,lan9668-otpc
> - const: microchip,lan9662-otpc
> + - const: microchip,lan9691-otpc
> + - const: microchip,lan9692-otpc
> + - const: microchip,lan9693-otpc
> + - const: microchip,lan9694-otpc
> + - const: microchip,lan9696-otpc
> + - const: microchip,lan9698-otpc

Why are you changing lan9668? Nothing on this is explained in commit
msg. Also, list of more than 3 items is not really useful.

> - enum:
> - microchip,lan9662-otpc
> + - microchip,lan9691-otpc

Why is it listed twice? First you say lan9662 is compatible with
lan9691, now you say it is not.

Best regards,
Krzysztof