Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Use pointer from memcpy() call for assignment in copy_partial_exec_reqs()

Next message: Josh Poimboeuf: "Re: [tip: objtool/core] objtool/klp: Add --debug option to show cloning decisions"
Previous message: Ian Rogers: "Re: [PATCH v2] perf s390-sample-raw: Cache counter names"
In reply to: Markus Elfring: "Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Use pointer from memcpy() call for assignment in copy_partial_exec_reqs()"
Next in thread: Markus Elfring: "Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Use pointer from memcpy() call for assignment in copy_partial_exec_reqs()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Jeff Hugo

Date: Fri Oct 31 2025 - 12:10:40 EST

On 10/31/2025 9:34 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:26:33 +0100

…>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This does not match the address this patch was received from, therefore DCO does not appear to be satisfied. I cannot accept this.

I find such a change rejection questionable.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc3#n409

I received this patch from "Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>". There is no SOB from "Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>" therefore "Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>" has not followed the DCO.

The resolution to this is either the author and the SOB change to "Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>" or "Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>" adds a SOB at the end to show the path the patch took (reference the paragraph in the documentation you linked to, starting at line 449).

-Jeff