Re: fall back from direct to buffered I/O when stable writes are required

[Keith Busch]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 02:00:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:18:46AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> > Modifying an IO buffer whilst a DIO is in flight on that buffer has
> > -always- been an application bug.
> 
> Says who?

Not sure of any official statement to that effect, but storage in
general always says the behavior of modifying data concurrently with
in-flight operations on that data produces non-deterministic results. An
application with such behavior sounds like a bug to me as I can't
imagine anyone purposefully choosing to persist data with a random
outcome. If PI is enabled, I think they'd rather get a deterministic
guard check error so they know they did something with undefined
behavior.

It's like having reads and writes to overlapping LBA and/or memory
ranges concurrently outstanding. There's no guaranteed result there
either; specs just say it's the host's responsibilty to not do that.
The kernel doesn't stop an application from trying that on raw block
direct-io, but I'd say that's an application bug.