Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: common: scmi_sensors: Replace const_ilog2() with ilog2()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 09:43:36AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:45:00 +0100
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> >  		tstamp_scale = sensor->sensor_info->tstamp_scale +
> > -			       const_ilog2(NSEC_PER_SEC) / const_ilog2(10);
> > +			       ilog2(NSEC_PER_SEC) / ilog2(10);
> 
> Is that just a strange way of writing 9 ?

Why? It's correct way of writing log¹⁰(NSEC_PER_SEC), the problem here is that
"i" people do not think about :-) But we have intlog10(), I completely forgot
about it.

> Mathematically log2(x)/log2(10) is log10(x) - which would be 9.
> The code does seem to be 'in luck' though.
> NSEC_PER_SEC is 10^9 or 0x3b9aca00, so ilog2(NSEC_PER_SEC) is 29.
> ilog2(10) is 3, and 29/3 is 9.
> 
> Do the same for 10^10 and you get 11.

That code looks like working by luck entirely, TBH. I just took the scope of
the patch to start dropping const_ilog2() usages.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko