Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] mm/userfaultfd: modulize memory types

From: Peter

Date: Thu Oct 30 2025 - 17:27:31 EST


thank you


On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 at 21:24, Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 08:23:03PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > +cc CoC
> >
> > Peter,
> >
> > I'm sorry but your reply here is completely out of line.
> >
> > I know tensions can run high sometimes, but this is a _good faith_ effort to try
> > to find a way forward.
> >
> > Please take a step back and show some respect for the fact that Liam has put
> > VERY significant effort in preparing this after you _repeatedly_ asked him to
> > show him code.
> >
> > I am starting to worry that your approach here is to bat off criticism by trying
> > to wear reviewers down and that's really not a good thing.
> >
> > Again, this is _good faith_. Nobody is trying to unreasonably push back on these
> > changes, we are just trying to find the best solution possible.
> >
> > Comments like:
> >
> > 'Your code allows to operate on pmd* in a module??? That's too risky and mm can
> > explode! Isn't it?'
> >
> > and 'that's the wrong way to go. I explained to you multiple times.'
> >
> > and 'I'm pretty sure my code introduce zero or very little bug, if there's one, I'll
> > fix it, but really, likely not, because the changes are straightforward.'
> >
> > vs. 'Your changes are huge. I would not be surprised you break things here and
> > there. I hope at least you will be around fixing them when it happens, even if
> > we're not sure the benefits of most of the changes.'
> >
> > are just _entirely_ unhelpful and really unacceptable.
> >
> > I have an extremely heavy workload at the moment anyway, but honestly
> > interactions like this have seriously put me off being involved in this review
> > personally.
> >
> > Do we really want this to be how review in mm or the kernel is?
> >
> > Is that really the culture we want to have here?
>
> Gosh.. Seriously?
>
> I'm ok if this needs to be audited. I have all the previous discussions in
> the cover letter as links.
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
>