Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] bpf: initial support for attaching struct ops to cgroups

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 5:03 PM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Oh, if there are other mechanisms to enforce boundaries, it's not a problem,
> but I can almost guarantee as the framework grows, there will be needs for
> kfuncs to identify and verify the callers and handlers communicating with
> each other along the hierarchy requiring recursive calls.

tbh I think it's a combination of sched_ext_ops and bpf infra problem.
All of the scx ops are missing "this" pointer which would have
been there if it was a C++ class.
And "this" should be pointing to an instance of class.
If sched-ext progs are attached to different cgroups, then
every attachment would have been a different instance and
different "this".
Then all kfuncs would effectively be declared as helper
methods within a class. In this case within "struct sched_ext_ops"
as functions that ops callback can call but they will
also have implicit "this" that points back to a particular instance.

Special aux__prog and prog_assoc are not exactly pretty
workarounds for lack of "this".