Re: [PATCH] fs: touch up predicts in putname()

[Markus Elfring]

…
> I verified this straightens out the asm, no functional changes.

Would a corresponding imperative wording become helpful for an improved change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc3#n94


How do you think about to refer to predictions for condition checks?

Regards,
Markus