Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] KVM: s390: Fix missing present bit for gmap puds
From: Claudio Imbrenda
Date: Wed Oct 29 2025 - 06:21:16 EST
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:00:14 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 28.10.25 14:01, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > For hugetlbs, gmap puds have the present bit set. For normal puds
> > (which point to ptes), the bit is not set. This is in contrast to the
> > normal userspace puds, which always have the bit set for present pmds.
> >
> > This causes issues when ___pte_offset_map() is modified to only check
> > for the present bit.
> >
> > The solution to the problem is simply to always set the present bit for
> > present gmap pmds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251017144924.10034-1-borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > index 8ff6bba107e8..22c448b32340 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > @@ -599,8 +599,9 @@ int __gmap_link(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, unsigned long vmaddr)
> > | _SEGMENT_ENTRY_GMAP_UC
> > | _SEGMENT_ENTRY;
> > } else
> > - *table = pmd_val(*pmd) &
> > - _SEGMENT_ENTRY_HARDWARE_BITS;
>
> I'd add a comment here like
>
> /* Make sure that pmd_present() will work on these entries. */
the whole file is going away very soon anyway
>
> > + *table = (pmd_val(*pmd) &
> > + _SEGMENT_ENTRY_HARDWARE_BITS)
> > + | _SEGMENT_ENTRY;
> > }
> > } else if (*table & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_PROTECT &&
> > !(pmd_val(*pmd) & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_PROTECT)) {
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>