Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: tps6586x: Fix initial enable_irq/disable_irq balance

[Jon Hunter]

Hi Esben,

On 16/05/2025 08:23, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> Interrupts are automatically enabled when requested, so we need to
> initialize irq_en accordingly to avoid causing an unbalanced enable
> warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
> index 54c8429b16bfcc692b1f4d5404f0c42f720e93b4..76ecf7b798f0de22aa89a552a263b473ab3065ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int tps6586x_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	irq_set_status_flags(rtc->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
>   
> +	rtc->irq_en = true;
>   	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq, NULL,
>   				tps6586x_rtc_irq,
>   				IRQF_ONESHOT,

I have bisected a suspend regression on one of our Tegra20 boards (that 
uses this driver) and bisect is pointing to this commit. Reverting this 
commit fixes the problem.

Looking at the above I see that the flag IRQ_NOAUTOEN is being set and 
so now with your change we never enable the interrupt. Hence, the 
wake-ups are now broken and suspend testing fails. So it would seem best 
to revert this.

BTW, I looked at the change to the CPCAP driver and that driver actively 
disables the IRQ after requesting it and so I am wondering if that will 
also have alarm issues? I don't have a board with CPCAP to test.

Thanks
Jon

--
nvpublic