Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Add charger PDR service path and service name to client data

From: Konrad Dybcio

Date: Tue Oct 28 2025 - 05:22:39 EST


On 10/27/25 10:22 PM, Anjelique Melendez wrote:
> Currently, the charger PD service path and service name are hard coded
> however these paths are not guaranteed to be the same between PMICs. For
> example, on Kaanapali and Glymur, Charger FW runs on SOCCP(another subsystem)
> which does not have any specific charger PDs defined.
>
> Define charger PDR service path and service name as client data so that
> each PMIC generation can properly define these paths.
>
> While at it, add the qcom,kaanapali-pmic-glink and
> qcom,glymur-pmic-glink compatible strings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anjelique Melendez <anjelique.melendez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

I think this change disqualifies Glymur from having a fallback to 8550,
since it couldn't have worked without ignoring the PDR

Konrad