Re: [PATCH RFC 11/19] slab: remove SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 3:31 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > but... since AI didn't find any bugs here, I must be wrong :)
> It's tricky. I think we could add a "bool was_partial == (prior != NULL)" or
> something to make it more obvious, that one is rather cryptic.

That would help. prior and !prior are hard to think about.
Your explanation makes sense. Thanks