Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/325] 5.10.246-rc2 review

From: Naresh Kamboju

Date: Wed Oct 29 2025 - 03:21:39 EST


On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 at 14:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.246 release.
> There are 325 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:28:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.246-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.246-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 98417fb6195f935428760a5fab4912492685ea1c
* git describe: v5.10.245-326-g98417fb6195f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.245-326-g98417fb6195f

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.244-123-g9abf794d1d5c)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.244-123-g9abf794d1d5c)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.244-123-g9abf794d1d5c)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.244-123-g9abf794d1d5c)

## Test result summary
total: 38069, pass: 30748, fail: 1930, skip: 5243, xfail: 148

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 100 total, 100 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 28 total, 27 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 21 total, 20 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 8 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org