Re: [PATCH 0/2] configfs: Constify some fileds in struct config_item_type

From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Sat Nov 01 2025 - 09:14:52 EST


Le 29/10/2025 à 08:18, Andreas Hindborg a écrit :
"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

These 2 patches constify ct_item_ops and ct_group_ops in struct
config_item_type.

When/if they are applied, I'll send some patchess in each subsystem to
constify the corresponding structures.

This 2 steps approach is IMHO easier way to make these changes.
This avoids long series and cover-letter/first patches sent to many
maintainers and lists.

However, if you prefer things to be done in the same serie, I can do
that as well.

Looks good to me. Please also include a patch to fix up the rust
bindings in the 2nd step:

diff --git a/rust/kernel/configfs.rs b/rust/kernel/configfs.rs
index 318a2f073d1c7..468c8c4170d5e 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/configfs.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/configfs.rs
@@ -755,8 +755,8 @@ pub const fn new_with_child_ctor<const N: usize, Child>(
Self {
item_type: Opaque::new(bindings::config_item_type {
ct_owner: owner.as_ptr(),
- ct_group_ops: GroupOperationsVTable::<Data, Child>::vtable_ptr().cast_mut(),
- ct_item_ops: ItemOperationsVTable::<$tpe, Data>::vtable_ptr().cast_mut(),
+ ct_group_ops: GroupOperationsVTable::<Data, Child>::vtable_ptr(),
+ ct_item_ops: ItemOperationsVTable::<$tpe, Data>::vtable_ptr(),
ct_attrs: core::ptr::from_ref(attributes).cast_mut().cast(),
ct_bin_attrs: core::ptr::null_mut(),
}),
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ pub const fn new<const N: usize>(
item_type: Opaque::new(bindings::config_item_type {
ct_owner: owner.as_ptr(),
ct_group_ops: core::ptr::null_mut(),
- ct_item_ops: ItemOperationsVTable::<$tpe, Data>::vtable_ptr().cast_mut(),
+ ct_item_ops: ItemOperationsVTable::<$tpe, Data>::vtable_ptr(),
ct_attrs: core::ptr::from_ref(attributes).cast_mut().cast(),
ct_bin_attrs: core::ptr::null_mut(),
}),


I'm not a big fan of mixing c and rs files updates in the same commit.
And, as I don't know rust, I'm reluctant to changes things that I don't understand and I'm not able to at least compile test.

Can s.o. send this change as a follow-up patch?

CJ



Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg