Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] net/mlx5e: Convert to new hwtstamp_get/set interface
From: Tariq Toukan
Date: Sun Nov 02 2025 - 07:15:21 EST
On 01/11/2025 1:42, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:25:10 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
- err = mlx5e_hwstamp_config_no_ptp_rx(priv,
- config.rx_filter != HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE);
+ err = mlx5e_hwstamp_config_no_ptp_rx(
+ priv, config->rx_filter != HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE);
FWIW I think this formatting is even worse than going over 80 :(
I'm trying to minimize checkpatch warnings while preserving code
readability.
IIRC, clang-format produces such open ended code lines, so I thought
this would be more acceptable.
In any case, I don't mind going with the over 80 option next time.