Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/memory-failure: remove the selection of RAS

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Nov 03 2025 - 07:48:21 EST

Next message: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI.com): "[PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Set wakeup-source system-states"
Previous message: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI.com): "[PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: Add wakeup-sources for low power modes"
In reply to: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/memory-failure: remove the selection of RAS"
Next in thread: Xie Yuanbin: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: support memory-failure on 32-bits with SPARSEMEM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 01:15:58PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> I rather wonder whether the memory-tracing code should live in a
> memory-failure.h instead.

Yah, move it pls. It doesn't belong there.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Next message: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI.com): "[PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Set wakeup-source system-states"
Previous message: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI.com): "[PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: Add wakeup-sources for low power modes"
In reply to: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/memory-failure: remove the selection of RAS"
Next in thread: Xie Yuanbin: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: support memory-failure on 32-bits with SPARSEMEM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]