Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] reset: handle RESET_GPIO better to provide the fallback

[Wolfram Sang]

> > What is the benefit of having reset-gpios handling in the reset core
> > optionally and required as a fallback?
> 
> Stable ABI rules require that, it is not about "benefits". Please send
> email to Linus and ask him: "can I make a change which breaks users of ABI".

I don't get it. If a driver already depends on RESET, then only the
handling code is moved from the driver to the reset core. Where is an
ABI breakage there?

> See four reports from Marek Szyprowski.

I am talking about the original i2c-mux patch here. Not the failed
attempt to get it working.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature