Re: [PATCH] sched: Increase sched_tick_remote timeout

From: Phil Auld
Date: Mon Nov 03 2025 - 16:58:39 EST



Hi Peter,

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 06:47:39AM -0400 Phil Auld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 12:13:00PM -0400 Phil Auld wrote:
> > Increase the sched_tick_remote WARN_ON timeout to remove false
> > positives due to temporarily busy HK cpus. The suggestion
> > was 30 seconds to catch really stuck remote tick processing
> > but not trigger it too easily.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Frederic ack'd this. Any other thoughts or opinions on this one
> character patch?

Can we have this timeout increase, please?


Thanks,
Phil

>
> Cheers,
> Phil
>
>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index be00629f0ba4..ef90d358252d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -5724,7 +5724,7 @@ static void sched_tick_remote(struct work_struct *work)
> > * reasonable amount of time.
> > */
> > u64 delta = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(delta > (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 3);
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(delta > (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 30);
> > }
> > curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
> >
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
>
> --
>
>

--