Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify freeing the special fields when update hash and local storage maps

From: Yonghong Song

Date: Tue Nov 04 2025 - 12:32:54 EST




On 10/30/25 8:24 AM, Leon Hwang wrote:
Add tests to verify that updating hash and local storage maps decrements
refcount when BPF_KPTR_REF objects are involved.

The tests perform the following steps:

1. Call update_elem() to insert an initial value.
2. Use bpf_refcount_acquire() to increment the refcount.
3. Store the node pointer in the map value.
4. Add the node to a linked list.
5. Probe-read the refcount and verify it is *2*.
6. Call update_elem() again to trigger refcount decrement.
7. Probe-read the refcount and verify it is *1*.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@xxxxxxxxx>

I applied this patch only (i.e., not including patches 1/2/3) to master
branch and do bpf selftest and all tests succeeded.

[root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -t refcounted_kptr
#294/1 refcounted_kptr/insert_read_both: remove from tree + list:OK
...
#294/18 refcounted_kptr/pcpu_hash_refcount_leak:OK
#294/19 refcounted_kptr/check_pcpu_hash_refcount:OK
#294/20 refcounted_kptr/hash_lock_refcount_leak:OK
#294/21 refcounted_kptr/check_hash_lock_refcount:OK
#294/22 refcounted_kptr/rbtree_sleepable_rcu:OK
#294/23 refcounted_kptr/rbtree_sleepable_rcu_no_explicit_rcu_lock:OK
#294/24 refcounted_kptr/cgroup_storage_lock_refcount_leak:OK
#294/25 refcounted_kptr/check_cgroup_storage_lock_refcount:OK
...

Did I miss anything?

---
.../bpf/prog_tests/refcounted_kptr.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/refcounted_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/refcounted_kptr.c
index d6bd5e16e6372..0ec91ff914af7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/refcounted_kptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/refcounted_kptr.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#include <network_helpers.h>
-
+#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
#include "refcounted_kptr.skel.h"
#include "refcounted_kptr_fail.skel.h"
@@ -44,3 +44,135 @@ void test_refcounted_kptr_wrong_owner(void)
ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "rbtree_wrong_owner_remove_fail_a2 retval");
refcounted_kptr__destroy(skel);
}
+
+static void test_refcnt_leak(struct refcounted_kptr *skel, int key, void *values, size_t values_sz,
+ u64 flags, struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_program *prog_leak,
+ struct bpf_program *prog_check, struct bpf_test_run_opts *opts)
+{
+ int ret, fd;
+
+ ret = bpf_map__update_elem(map, &key, sizeof(key), values, values_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_map__update_elem init"))
+ return;
+
+ fd = bpf_program__fd(prog_leak);
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fd, opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts"))
+ return;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->kptr_refcount, 2, "refcount"))
+ return;
+
+ ret = bpf_map__update_elem(map, &key, sizeof(key), values, values_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_map__update_elem dec refcount"))
+ return;
+
+ fd = bpf_program__fd(prog_check);
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fd, opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->kptr_refcount, 1, "refcount");
+}
+

[...]