Re: [PATCH] fsi: Fix device refcount leak in i2cr_scom_probe

[Markus Elfring]

> This patch fixes a device reference count leak …

Would a corresponding imperative wording become helpful for an improved change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc4#n94

Would a summary phrase like “Fix reference count leak in i2cr_scom_probe()” be nicer?

Regards,
Markus