Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] media: dt-bindings: qcom-kaanapali-iris: Add kaanapali video codec binding

From: Vikash Garodia

Date: Thu Nov 06 2025 - 09:50:47 EST



On 10/22/2025 9:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 22/10/2025 17:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

[ 1.361157] pc : qcom_smmu_write_s2cr+0x64/0xa4
[ 1.361165] lr : arm_smmu_write_s2cr+0x2c/0xbc
[ 1.361168] sp : ffff80008005b8f0
[ 1.361169] x29: ffff80008005b8f0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffc7f252f45320
....
[ 1.361195] x2 : ffff800081200c48 x1 : 0000000000000048 x0 : ffff800081200000
[ 1.361198] Call trace:
[ 1.361199] qcom_smmu_write_s2cr+0x64/0xa4 (P)
[ 1.361203] arm_smmu_master_install_s2crs+0x7c/0xac
[ 1.361207] arm_smmu_attach_dev+0xb0/0x1d4

Could you please suggest on listing the iommu items ? I did not find the
relevant references in other bindings where flexible iommus is being listed.

Krzysztof would probably like to see what I believe someone else somewhere
sometime suggested in the iommus discussions (sorry it's not possible to
keep track of it all), where the DT can list every possible required iommu
sid, but the driver ensures only the ones that are necessary are utilized.

This will require big changes to the iommu framework though, I'm afraid

I already asked this.

+
+ memory-region:
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 2

Same comment. I already asked this about iommus.

Same here, there aren't any bindings which lists for flexible memory-region.
Please suggest if there are any such references.

Similarly, we can define the additional memory region that's necessary
for $reasons and leave it unused in the driver (actually I don't know
why there may be two, but let's assume it's a QTEE/noQTEE detail), because
for the hw to operate, it must be set up by some entity in the system
either way (i.e. the memory is reserved even if it's not done by Linux)


Another point is pretty obvious: if one claims that
iommus/memory-regions list is flexible - some elements are optional -
then clearly there is a distinction which elements are mandatory and
which are optional. So there is difference between elements of the
array. If there is a difference, they all must be explicitly listed,
like every other list (clocks, resets etc) property. Writing bindings
doc also defines this rule.


I would like to describe the video bindings covering all the interfaces, including the secure stream ids. For this to do, i would have to wait for [1] to conclude. Will put up a new revision on this series, to exclude the binding patch and the one which enables kaanapali. That way we can have the driver prepared for vpu4, while kaanapali binding and patch to enable it in driver can be raised separately later once [1] is concluded.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1762235099.git.charan.kalla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Regards,
Vikash