Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize core cookie matching check

From: K Prateek Nayak

Date: Wed Nov 05 2025 - 11:34:15 EST


Hello Fernand,

On 11/5/2025 8:55 PM, Fernand Sieber wrote:
> Early return true if the core cookie matches. This avoids the SMT mask
> loop to check for an idle core, which might be more expensive on wide
> platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index adfb6e3409d7..381cd561e99b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1432,6 +1432,9 @@ static inline bool sched_core_cookie_match(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
> return true;
>
> + if (rq->core->core_cookie == p->core_cookie)
> + return true;

nit. We can use sched_cpu_cookie_match(rq, p) to check for the
above two conditions. but even this is good.

Apart from that, I think this optimization makes sense.

> +
> for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(cpu_of(rq))) {
> if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> idle_core = false;
> @@ -1443,7 +1446,7 @@ static inline bool sched_core_cookie_match(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> * A CPU in an idle core is always the best choice for tasks with
> * cookies.
> */
> - return idle_core || rq->core->core_cookie == p->core_cookie;
> + return idle_core;

Peter, do we care about checking the core_cookie again before
returning just in case the task cookie was selected between the
check above an here?

If not, then this looks good to me. Feel free to include:

Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx>

> }
>
> static inline bool sched_group_cookie_match(struct rq *rq,

--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek