Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sc8280xp-pas: Fix CDSP power desc

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 11/5/25 10:14 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 08:31:07PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The power requirements for the CDSP instances on SC8280XP aren't fully
>> described, with only one of the three present. Fix that.
>>
>> Fixes: ee651cd1e944 ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add sc8280xp adsp and nsp pair")
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml
>> index 96d53baf6e00..5dbda3a55047 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml
>> @@ -91,9 +91,13 @@ allOf:
>>          power-domains:
>>            items:
>>              - description: NSP power domain
>> +            - description: CX power domain
>> +            - description: MXC power domain
>>          power-domain-names:
>>            items:
>>              - const: nsp
>> +            - const: cx
>> +            - const: mxc
> 
> Heh, so if this was described since beginning entire binding would fit
> 100% into qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml, instead having this now in different
> file because of different order. Not great. :(

Yeah I noticed the same.. It's probably not the last conversion like
that which will need to happen either..

Konrad