Re: [PATCH] gpio: menz127: add support for 16Z034 and 16Z037 GPIO controllers

From: Bartosz Golaszewski

Date: Wed Nov 05 2025 - 03:37:05 EST


On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 11:08 AM Jose Javier Rodriguez Barbarin
<dev-josejavier.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From 7655a73f3888a5d164d1f287ba1f2989bb2aadd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Javier Rodriguez <josejavier.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:40:14 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio: menz127: add support for 16Z034 and 16Z037 GPIO
> controllers
>

I don't think you used `git send-email` to send this, did you just
copy the contents of the generated .patch into the email client?

> The 16Z034 and 16Z037 are 8 bits GPIO controllers that share the
> same registers and features of the 16Z127 GPIO controller.
>
> Reviewed-by: Felipe Fensen Casado <felipe.jensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Rodriguez <josejavier.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-menz127.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-menz127.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-menz127.c
> index da2bf9381cc4..ec9228f1e631 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-menz127.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-menz127.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
> #define MEN_Z127_ODER 0x1C
> #define GPIO_TO_DBCNT_REG(gpio) ((gpio * 4) + 0x80)
>
> +

Stray newline.

> +/* MEN Z127 supported model ids*/
> +#define MEN_Z127_ID 0x7f
> +#define MEN_Z034_ID 0x22
> +#define MEN_Z037_ID 0x25
> +
> #define MEN_Z127_DB_MIN_US 50
> /* 16 bit compare register. Each bit represents 50us */
> #define MEN_Z127_DB_MAX_US (0xffff * MEN_Z127_DB_MIN_US)
> @@ -36,6 +42,25 @@ struct men_z127_gpio {
> struct resource *mem;
> };
>
> +static int men_z127_lookup_gpio_size(struct mcb_device *mdev,
> + unsigned long *sz)
> +{
> + switch (mdev->id) {
> + case MEN_Z127_ID:
> + *sz = 4;
> + break;
> + case MEN_Z034_ID:
> + case MEN_Z037_ID:
> + *sz = 1;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(&mdev->dev, "no size found for id %d", mdev->id);
> + return -EINVAL;

You can return dev_err_probe() here, it's only used in probe(). But
TBH probe() is so small I'd just inline this into it.

> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int men_z127_debounce(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned gpio,
> unsigned debounce)
> {
> @@ -140,6 +165,7 @@ static int men_z127_probe(struct mcb_device *mdev,
> struct men_z127_gpio *men_z127_gpio;
> struct device *dev = &mdev->dev;
> int ret;
> + unsigned long sz;
>
> men_z127_gpio = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct men_z127_gpio),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -163,9 +189,13 @@ static int men_z127_probe(struct mcb_device *mdev,
>
> mcb_set_drvdata(mdev, men_z127_gpio);
>
> + ret = men_z127_lookup_gpio_size(mdev, &sz);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> config = (struct gpio_generic_chip_config) {
> .dev = &mdev->dev,
> - .sz = 4,
> + .sz = sz,
> .dat = men_z127_gpio->reg_base + MEN_Z127_PSR,
> .set = men_z127_gpio->reg_base + MEN_Z127_CTRL,
> .dirout = men_z127_gpio->reg_base + MEN_Z127_GPIODR,
> @@ -186,7 +216,9 @@ static int men_z127_probe(struct mcb_device *mdev,
> }
>
> static const struct mcb_device_id men_z127_ids[] = {
> - { .device = 0x7f },
> + { .device = MEN_Z127_ID },
> + { .device = MEN_Z034_ID },
> + { .device = MEN_Z037_ID },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(mcb, men_z127_ids);
> --
> 2.51.0

Bartosz