Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: stmmac: loongson: Use generic PCI suspend/resume routines

[Yao Zi]

On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 05:22:53PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 03:16:46PM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> > @@ -367,6 +367,8 @@ config DWMAC_INTEL
> >  	  This selects the Intel platform specific bus support for the
> >  	  stmmac driver. This driver is used for Intel Quark/EHL/TGL.
> >  
> > +if STMMAC_LIBPCI
> > +
> >  config DWMAC_LOONGSON
> >  	tristate "Loongson PCI DWMAC support"
> >  	default MACH_LOONGSON64
> 
> As the next line is:
> 
>         depends on (MACH_LOONGSON64 || COMPILE_TEST) && STMMAC_ETH && PCI
> 
> where STMMAC_LIBPCI depends on PCI, and the whole lot is surrounded by
> if STMMAC_ETH ... endif, shouldn't this become:
> 
> 	depends on MACH_LOONGSON64 || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> ?
> 
> Otherwise, looks good, thanks.

I was originally planning to send a separate patch to remove the
redundant depends on STMMAC_ETH, since STMMAC_SELFTESTS,
STMMAC_PLATFORM, DWMAC_INTEL have similar issues. But yes PCI could be
removed from the depends as well with this series applied, so I'm not
sure whether it's better to do the simplication for DWMAC_LOONGSON and
STMMAC_PCI while adding STMMAC_LIBPCI dependency to them, or separate a
patch with a clear topic "removing redundant depends".

I prefer a separate patch to do all the Kconfig clean-up, but am willing
to simplify the depends lines in this series, too if you consider it's
better.

By the way, if I need to send v4 of the series with your proposed
simplification, should I apply your Reviewed-by tag for PATCH 2 and 3?

Thanks,
Yao Zi

> -- 
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!