Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO board
From: FUKAUMI Naoki
Date: Tue Nov 04 2025 - 20:38:27 EST
Hi Krzysztof
On 10/28/25 19:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28/10/2025 10:44, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
Hi Joseph
Your patch seems to be NAKed.
I will submit new patch soon.
Sorry, what? Don't hijack other people's work.
I have Joseph's permission to post my patch.
Furthermore, this is not the first time, to my knowledge, that someone else has posted another patch for the same board. (See below)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241226005845.46473-1-naoki@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250324-rock5bp-for-upstream-v1-0-6217edf15b19@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
Best regards,
--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Best regards,
--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
On 10/28/25 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28/10/2025 10:33, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20250528221823.2974653-2-joseph.kogut@xxxxxxxxx/
On 5/29/25 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:18:21PM GMT, Joseph Kogut wrote:Please explain the sorting rule used for this file. You must have known
Add device tree binding for the Radxa CM5 IO board.
This board is based on the rk3588s.
Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
interfere with applying entire sets.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
the sorting rule; otherwise, how can you be sure this patch is correct?
Huh? I don't have a clue about sorting rule but if you mock my review
let's make it different:
NAK
Ah, you were poking around other patch? I should have ignored that :/
Best regards,
Krzysztof