Re: [PATCH 1/1] checkpatch: add MA_STATE to declaration_macros

[jim . cromie]

On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 5:52 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2025-11-08 at 16:47 -0700, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > MA_STATE is used repeatedly as a declaration, add it to the list.
>
> OK but
>
> > I left out the $Storage regex component, since I saw no cases wanting
> > it, via: $> grep -r -B1 '\bMA_STATE' .
> >
> > This change fixes the following, reproduced locally.
>
> No following ?

the oe-kbuild report followed, but the link didnt work right..

>
> And I looked at the MA_STATE macro definition that has
> several NULL or zero unnecessary member initializations
> but doesn't initialize the entire structure as all
> non-named members are NULL or zero by default.
>
> I wonder if the unnecessary NULL/0 initializations there
> could actually increase the object size.
>
> With gcc 15.2.1 allyesconfig & defconfig do not change
> either way but I don't know if all supported versions
> minimize the initialization properly.
>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511071306.OJpTf7fK-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> This Closes: url is not found on lore

That is weird.
when I follow the Closes link, I get something unexpected - a "not
found - look here maybe",
AND a ../oe-kbuild/ link -
clicking that takes me to the report proper.

If you retry, you can edit the "-all" out of the URL and it works.

It sounds like a small bug somewhere in the lkp-robot CI chain.


>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index e722dd6fa8ef..4b5e2e64dece 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -1096,7 +1096,8 @@ our $declaration_macros = qr{(?x:
> >       (?:$Storage\s+)?(?:[A-Z_][A-Z0-9]*_){0,2}(?:DEFINE|DECLARE)(?:_[A-Z0-9]+){1,6}\s*\(|
> >       (?:$Storage\s+)?[HLP]?LIST_HEAD\s*\(|
> >       (?:SKCIPHER_REQUEST|SHASH_DESC|AHASH_REQUEST)_ON_STACK\s*\(|
> > -     (?:$Storage\s+)?(?:XA_STATE|XA_STATE_ORDER)\s*\(
> > +     (?:$Storage\s+)?(?:XA_STATE|XA_STATE_ORDER)\s*\(|
> > +     (?:MA_STATE)\s*\(
> >  )};
> >
> >  our %allow_repeated_words = (