Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] x86/acpi: Move acpi_wakeup_cpu() and helpers to smpwakeup.c

From: Ricardo Neri

Date: Mon Nov 10 2025 - 12:42:41 EST


On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 02:40:37PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:43:50PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > I did not want to enable the whole of ACPI code as I need a tiny portion of it.
> > Then yes, saving memory and having a smaller binary were considerations.
> >
> > The only dependency that ACPI_MADT_WAKEUP has on ACPI is the code to read and
> > parse the ACPI table that enumerates the mailbox. (There are a couple of
> > declarations for CPU offlining that need tweaking if I want ACPI_MADT_WAKEUP to
> > not depend on ACPI at all).
> >
> > The DeviceTree firmware only needs the code to wake CPUs up. That is the code
> > I am carving out.
> >
> > Having said that, vmlinux and bzImage increase by 4% if I enable ACPI.
>
> So, is it a concern or not? I cannot understand from the above whether you
> care about 4% or not.

I apologize for my late reply. Also, I am sorry I was not clear. I needed to
consult with a few stakeholders whether they could live with the increase in
size resulting from having CONFIG_ACPI=y. They can.

If it is OK with Rafael, I plan to post a new version that drops this patch and
adds the necessary function stubs for the !CONFIG_ACPI case.

Thanks and BR,
Ricardo