Re: [PATCH] firmware: stratix10-rsu: replace scnprintf() with sysfs_emit() in *_show() functions
From: Rahul Kumar
Date: Tue Nov 11 2025 - 01:38:54 EST
On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 10:15 AM Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/2/25 23:55, Rahul Kumar wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 3:11 PM Rahul Kumar <rk0006818@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Replace scnprintf() with sysfs_emit() in sysfs *_show() functions
> >> in stratix10-rsu.c to follow the kernel's guidelines from
> >> Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst.
> >>
> >> This improves consistency, safety, and makes the code easier to
> >> maintain and update in the future.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rahul Kumar <rk0006818@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c | 7 +++----
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c
> >> index 1ea39a0a76c7..53c896ceca9a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c
> >> @@ -454,8 +454,7 @@ static ssize_t max_retry_show(struct device *dev,
> >> if (!priv)
> >> return -ENODEV;
> >>
> >> - return scnprintf(buf, sizeof(priv->max_retry),
> >> - "0x%08x\n", priv->max_retry);
> >> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%08x\n", priv->max_retry);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static ssize_t dcmf0_show(struct device *dev,
> >> @@ -632,7 +631,7 @@ static ssize_t spt0_address_show(struct device *dev,
> >> if (priv->spt0_address == INVALID_SPT_ADDRESS)
> >> return -EIO;
> >>
> >> - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%08lx\n", priv->spt0_address);
> >> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%08lx\n", priv->spt0_address);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static ssize_t spt1_address_show(struct device *dev,
> >> @@ -646,7 +645,7 @@ static ssize_t spt1_address_show(struct device *dev,
> >> if (priv->spt1_address == INVALID_SPT_ADDRESS)
> >> return -EIO;
> >>
> >> - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%08lx\n", priv->spt1_address);
> >> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%08lx\n", priv->spt1_address);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(current_image);
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> >
> > Hi Dinguyen,
> >
> > Just following up to see if you’ve had a chance to review this patch,
> > or if there’s anything more needed from my side.
> >
> > Link to v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015094117.535157-1-rk0006818@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rahul
>
> Sorry about that. I've applied it.
>
> Thanks,
> Dinh
>
Hi Dinh,
Could you please share the commit ID where this patch was applied?
Thanks,
Rahul