Re: [PATCH v17 0/9] platform/x86: Add asus-armoury driver

From: Ilpo Järvinen

Date: Tue Nov 11 2025 - 05:46:07 EST


On Mon, 10 Nov 2025, Denis Benato wrote:
> On 11/10/25 16:17, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Nov 2025, Denis Benato wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> the TL;DR:
> >> 1. Introduce new module to contain bios attributes, using fw_attributes_class
> >> 2. Deprecate all possible attributes from asus-wmi that were added ad-hoc
> >> 3. Remove those in the next LTS cycle
> >>
> >> The idea for this originates from a conversation with Mario Limonciello
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/371d4109-a3bb-4c3b-802f-4ec27a945c99@xxxxxxx/
> >>
> >> It is without a doubt much cleaner to use, easier to discover, and the
> >> API is well defined as opposed to the random clutter of attributes I had
> >> been placing in the platform sysfs. Given that Derek is also working on a
> >> similar approach to Lenovo in part based on my initial work I'd like to think
> >> that the overall approach is good and may become standardised for these types
> >> of things.
> >>
> >> Regarding PPT: it is intended to add support for "custom" platform profile
> >> soon. If it's a blocker for this patch series being accepted I will drop the
> >> platform-x86-asus-armoury-add-ppt_-and-nv_-tuning.patch and get that done
> >> separately to avoid holding the bulk of the series up. Ideally I would like
> >> to get the safe limits in so users don't fully lose functionality or continue
> >> to be exposed to potential instability from setting too low, or be mislead
> >> in to thinking they can set limits higher than actual limit.
> >>
> >> The bulk of the PPT patch is data, the actual functional part is relatively
> >> small and similar to the last version.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I've been rather busy over the months and may not cover
> >> everything in the v7 changelog but I've tried to be as comprehensive as I can.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Luke
> >>
> >> Changelog:
> >> - v1
> >> - Initial submission
> >> - v2
> >> - Too many changes to list, but all concerns raised in previous submission addressed.
> >> - History: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20240716051612.64842-1-luke@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >> - v3
> >> - All concerns addressed.
> >> - History: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20240806020747.365042-1-luke@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >> - v4
> >> - Use EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL() for the symbols required in this patch series
> >> - Add patch for hid-asus due to the use of EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL()
> >> - Split the PPT knobs out to a separate patch
> >> - Split the hd_panel setting out to a new patch
> >> - Clarify some of APU MEM configuration and convert int to hex
> >> - Rename deprecated Kconfig option to ASUS_WMI_DEPRECATED_ATTRS
> >> - Fixup cyclic dependency in Kconfig
> >> - v5
> >> - deprecate patch: cleanup ``#if`, ``#endif` statements, edit kconfig detail, edit commit msg
> >> - cleanup ppt* tuning patch
> >> - proper error handling in module init, plus pr_err()
> >> - ppt tunables have a notice if there is no match to get defaults
> >> - better error handling in cpu core handling
> >> - don't continue if failure
> >> - use the mutex to gate WMI writes
> >> - V6
> >> - correctly cleanup/unwind if module init fails
> >> - V7
> >> - Remove review tags where the code changed significantly
> >> - Add auto_screen_brightness WMI attribute support
> >> - Move PPT patch to end
> >> - Add support min/max PPT values for 36 laptops (and two handhelds)
> >> - reword commit for "asus-wmi: export symbols used for read/write WMI"
> >> - asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury
> >> - Correction to license header
> >> - Remove the (initial) mutex use (added for core count only in that patch)
> >> - Clarify some doc comments (attr_int_store)
> >> - Cleanup pr_warn in dgpu/egpu/mux functions
> >> - Restructure logic in asus_fw_attr_add()
> >> - Check gpu_mux_dev_id and mini_led_dev_id before remove attrs
> >> - asus-armoury: add core count control:
> >> - add mutex to prevent possible concurrent write to the core
> >> count WMI due to separated bit/little attributes
> >> - asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs:
> >> - Move to end of series
> >> - Refactor to use a table of allowed min/max values to
> >> ensure safe settings
> >> - General code cleanup
> >> - Ensure checkpatch.pl returns clean for all
> >> - V8
> >> - asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module
> >> - Further cleanup: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20250316230724.100165-2-luke@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m72e203f64a5a28c9c21672406b2e9f554a8a8e38
> >> - asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - Address concerns in https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20250316230724.100165-2-luke@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m77971b5c1e7f018954c16354e623fc06522c5e41
> >> - Refactor struct asus_armoury_priv to record both AC and DC settings
> >> - Tidy macros and functions affected by the above to be clearer as a result
> >> - Move repeated strings such as "ppt_pl1_spl" to #defines
> >> - Split should_create_tunable_attr() in to two functions to better clarify:
> >> - is_power_tunable_attr()
> >> - has_valid_limit()
> >> - Restructure init_rog_tunables() to initialise AC and DC in a
> >> way that makes more sense.
> >> - Ensure that if DC setting table is not available then attributes
> >> return -ENODEV only if on DC mode.
> >> - V9
> >> - asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module
> >> - return -EBUSY when eGPU/dGPU cannot be deactivated
> >> - asus-armoury: add apu-mem control support
> >> - discard the WMI presence bit fixing the functionality
> >> - asus-armoury: add core count control
> >> - replace mutex lock/unlock with guard
> >> - move core count alloc for initialization in init_max_cpu_cores()
> >> - v10
> >> - platform/x86: asus-wmi: export symbols used for read/write WMI
> >> - fix error with redefinition of asus_wmi_set_devstate
> >> - asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module
> >> - hwmon or other -> hwmon or others
> >> - fix wrong function name in documentation (attr_uint_store)
> >> - use kstrtouint where appropriate
> >> - (*) fix unreachable code warning: the fix turned out to be partial
> >> - improve return values in case of error in egpu_enable_current_value_store
> >> - asus-armoury: asus-armoury: add screen auto-brightness toggle
> >> - actually register screen_auto_brightness attribute
> >> - v11
> >> - cover-letter:
> >> - reorganize the changelog of v10
> >> - asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module
> >> - move the DMIs list in its own include, fixing (*) for good
> >> - asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - fix warning about redefinition of ppt_pl2_sppt_def for GV601R
> >> - v12
> >> - asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - add min/max values for FA608WI and FX507VI
> >> - v13
> >> - asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - fix a typo in a comment about _def attributes
> >> - add min/max values for GU605CW and G713PV
> >> - asus-armoury: add apu-mem control support
> >> - fix a possible out-of-bounds read in apu_mem_current_value_store
> >> - v14
> >> - platform/x86: asus-wmi: rename ASUS_WMI_DEVID_PPT_FPPT
> >> - added patch to rename the symbol for consistency
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - remove the unchecked usage of dmi_get_system_info while
> >> also increasing consistency with other messages
> >> - v15
> >> - platform/x86: asus-wmi: export symbols used for read/write WMI
> >> - fix kernel doc
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module
> >> - avoid direct calls to asus-wmi and provide helpers instead
> >> - rework xg mobile activation logic
> >> - add helper for enum allowed attributes
> >> - improve mini_led_mode_current_value_store
> >> - improved usage of kstrtouint, kstrtou32 and kstrtobool
> >> - unload attributes in reverse order of loading
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: add apu-mem control support
> >> - fix return value in apu_mem_current_value_show
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: add core count control
> >> - put more safeguards in place against possible bricking of laptops
> >> - improve loading logic
> >> - platform/x86: asus-wmi: deprecate bios features
> >> - modified deprecation message
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - make _store(s) to interfaces unusable in DC to fail,
> >> instead of accepting 0 as a value (0 is also invalid)
> >> - make it easier to understand AC vs DC logic
> >> - improved init_rog_tunables() logic
> >> - commas after every field in the table for consistency
> >> - add support for RC73 handheld
> >> -v16
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - add support for GU605CX
> >> -v17
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs
> >> - fix RC73 -> RC73AX as another RC73 exists
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: add core count control
> >> - be more tolerant on out-or-range current CPU cores count
> >> - platform/x86: asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module
> >> - fix usage of undeclared static functions in macros
> > I've applied this to the review-ilpo-next branch. I'm still not entirely
> > happy with how the cpu cores change does store values without arrays but
> > it's not an end of the world (and could be fixed in tree).
> Hello and thanks.
>
> You would make me very happy applying things as Luke wrote them
> so that successive modifications are more easily compared to
> what those were doing before I changed them...

I just took them as they were so you should be "happy" now :-)

...Even if I didn't like having all those as separate variables requiring
if statements here and there, which could be avoided if core type would be
an array index so one could simply do:

...
case CPU_CORE_MAX:
cpu_core_value = asus_armoury.cpu_cores[core_type]->max;
break;
...

Doing that transformation incrementally looks simple enough it should be
low risk after a careful review.

> Also if you have some more hints on how I could change that
> interface (while avoiding bad surprises due to index mismatch)
> I will try my best... without destroying any laptop...
> perhaps... Hopefully? Wish me luck.
>
> > I had to reorder a few includes to make the order alphabetical which
> > luckily worked out without causing conflicts within the subsequent
> > patches (and a need to respin the series). Please try to remember to
> > keep those in the alphabetical order.
>
> I have noticed a pair of warnings in this v17 I would like to solve:
> one line is too long, I should break it and one macro has an
> unused parameter.
>
> No semantic changes.
>
> I have seen one of those unordered includes in asus-armoury.h...
> That branch is public in your git tree: this means I can respin
> a v18 from a git format-path, correct?

While I could replace the previous series with a new version, it would
probably just be better to send incremental patches and I can see myself
if I fold them into the existing patches or not.

> Is your repo the one in
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ij/linux.git/ ?
> I see from the web interface that the last modification was
> 2 years ago?

That's pretty much unused repo.

Platform drivers repo is here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git

--
i.