Re: [PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD: Add additional fixed microcode for SB-7055

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:13:45PM -0800, Christian Ludloff wrote:
> > @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static bool need_sha_check(u32 cur_rev)
> >  case 0xb1010: return cur_rev <= 0xb101046; break;
> >  case 0xb2040: return cur_rev <= 0xb204031; break;
> >  case 0xb4040: return cur_rev <= 0xb404031; break;
> > + case 0xb4041: return cur_rev <= 0xb404101; break;
> >  case 0xb6000: return cur_rev <= 0xb600031; break;
> >  case 0xb6080: return cur_rev <= 0xb608031; break;
> >  case 0xb7000: return cur_rev <= 0xb700031; break;
> 
> Unrelated to your specific change here, but related to this list/code:
> 
> For the 0xb1010 case, microcode itself reports min_rev=0xb101040,
> suggesting that its entry in this list should use <= 0xb10103f instead.

Thanks, looking at it, this is wrong too:

case 0xb0021: return cur_rev <= 0xb002146; break;

It looks like a discrepancy in the internal documentation - I'm clarifying
with microcode folks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette