Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

[Damien Le Moal]

On 11/14/25 8:07 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/13/25 3:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>>   7b2038b1b1d4 ("dm: fix zone reset all operation processing")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>>   Fixes: db9aed869f34 ("block: introduce disk_report_zone()").
>>
>> has these problem(s):
>>
>>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
>>
>> Maybe you meant
>>
>> Fixes: fdb9aed869f3 ("block: introduce disk_report_zone()")
> 
> Guys, that's now three funky shas that have never existed in my tree.
> Can we please exercise a bit more diligence in actually tagging patches
> correctly?

My apologies about this. I was careful to take these from a fresh pull of
block/for-next but I obviously screwed-up the copy paste, missing the first
character.

> Stephen, can't sort them out now, as they are deeper in the stack. So I
> guess we'll have to live with these two as well... And I guess I really
> need to get my scripts setup to catch these kinds of errors, sadly.

Stephen,

My apologies for the overhead.


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research